LNG Resources
Top Ten Resources
Top Ten Info Sheet (pdf)
Woodside Petroleum: Fact or Fiction? (pdf)
Partners in the News
LNG is a fossil fuel. 
February 1, 2008 pdf
LNG is a foreign fuel. 
Reliance on imported gas leaves California vulnerable to price shocks and supply disruptions (p. 20) pdf
LNG is not necessary. 
Review LNG vs. Natural Gas: LNG not necessary for Oregon pdf
California State Utilities
2008 Gas Report: Overall gas demand for electric generation is expected to be virtually flat for the next 22 years pdf
LNG is not green energy. 
Collision Course: How Imported Liquefied Natural Gas Will Undermine Clean Energy in California info
California Public Utilities Commission Filings, August 2007
Woodside Petroleum's LNG project may harm wildlife. 
September 30, 2007 info
American Cetacean Society info
Ocean Conservation Society info
The Butterfly Conservation Initiative info
Woodside Petroleum's LNG project may attract terrorism. 
The Cutting Edge, June 2, 2008 info
January 11, 2008 info
Institute for the Analysis of Global Security: LNG 2004 info
December 21, 2004 info
Woodside Petroleum's LNG project will impact our quality of life. 
Energy Justice Network info
Woodside Petroleum's LNG project will unfairly burden the underserved. 
Energy Justice Network info
Woodside Petroleum's LNG project poses serious safety risks. 
LNG is economically flawed. 
Cheap gas over, says ex-Woodside executive
August 1, 2008 info
March 10, 2008 info
March 12, 2008 info
March 9, 2008 info
Natural gas price spike: It's not a question of if, but when
March 9, 2008